Target material selection for coating SEM samples
using an SEM sputter coater

Introduction
The coating material for making a non-conductive SEM sample conductive should be selected to achieve optimum performance. There is no such thing as a universal coating materials and target materials might vary for different sample materials and desired results. Most SEM sputter coaters allow for an easy and quick target chance, thus selecting and using the optimum target material doesn't require a lot of effort.
When using other coating (target) materials than Gold, the use of lab grade Argon as process gas is paramount. The coating quality is affected by the target material, process parameters and by the interaction with the sample material. Benefits of coating non-conductive SEM samples are:

  • Coating an SEM sample with a highly conductive metal makes non-conductive SEM samples conductive to avoid charging of the sample surface. Enabling higher resolution imaging due to higher sample stability under the electron beam
  • Most coating materials have a (much) higher secondary electron (SE) yield than the non- conductive sample materials. In most cases, coating SEM samples with only a nm of Au or Pt increases the signal to noise ratio dramatically, resulting in crisp and clear images

Below some practical guidance information for selecting the target material and expected grain size of the coating is given. The information is only valid when using a modern DC magnetron SEM sputter coater with Argon as process gas. Grain size of the coating depends strongly on coating thickness and coating material/sample material interaction. Using standard coating conditions and coating similar sample materials the following grain sizes can be expected:
Gold, silver:         5-10nm
Palladium:           5-10nm
Gold/Palladium: 4-8nm
Platinum:             2-3nm
Iridium:                 1-2nm
Chromium:          1-2nm
Tungsten:            <1nm

If EDX analysis of the sample is needed,  try to select a coating (target) material which is not present in the sample. This would avoid overlapping peaks in the EDX spectrum or confusion within the EDX analysis.


Selection guide table for target materials for SEM, FESEM and EDX  applications

 

Target Materials

Application

Au

Au/Pd

Ag

Pt

Pt/Pd

Ir

Cr

W

Ta

Pd

Ni

Cu

Ti

C*

Low and medium magnifications

V

V

V

V

V

V

-

-

-

V

V

V

-

V

High resolution imaging

-

-

-

V

V

V

V

V

V

-

-

-

-

V

Ultra-high resolution imaging

-

-

-

-

V

V

V

V

V

-

-

-

-

V

SE signal boost (1nm or less)

V

-

-

V

-

V

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

BSE imaging

-

-

-

-

-

-

V

-

-

V

-

-

-

V

Table top SEM coating with air

V

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Gold colloids imaging

-

-

-

-

-

-

V

-

-

-

-

-

-

V

EDX analysis

-

-

-

-

-

-

V

-

-

-

V

V

V

V

Light element analysis

-

-

-

-

-

V

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

EBSD (2-3nm)

V

-

-

V

-

V

-

V

-

-

-

-

-

V

* Carbon evaporated in a high vacuum coater

  • Coating material with lower atomic numbers is more suitable for BSE (back scattered electron) imaging.
  • Coating with higher atomic numbers is more suitable for SE imaging.

Physical properties of target materials for small desktop sputter coaters.

Target Metal

Symbol

Atomic Number

Atomic weight

Density g/cm3

Melting point °C

Carbon

C

6

12.011

2.27

3500

Magnesium

Mg

12

24.305

1.74

650

Aluminium

Al

13

26.982

2.70

660

Titanium

Ti

22

47.88

4.51

1668

Vanadium

V

23

50.942

6.11

1910

Chromium

Cr

24

51.996

7.14

1907

Manganese

Mn

25

54.938

7.47

1246

Iron

Fe

26

55.847

7.87

1538

Cobalt

Co

27

58.933

8.90

1495

Nickel

Ni

28

58.7

8.91

1455

Copper

Cu

29

63.546

8.92

1085

Zinc

Zn

30

65.39

7.14

420

Zirconium

Zr

40

91.22

6.51

1855

Niobium

Nb

41

92.906

8.57

2477

Molybdenum

Mo

42

95.94

10.28

26.23

Palladium

Pd

46

106.42

12.02

1555

Silver

Ag

47

107.868

10.49

962

Indium

In

49

114.82

7.31

157

Tin

Sn

50

118.71

7.31

232

Tantalum

Ta

73

180.948

16.65

3017

Tungsten

W

74

183.85

19.25

3422

Iridium

Ir

77

192.22

22.65

2466

Platinum

Pt

78

195.08

21.09

1768

Gold

Au

79

196.967

19.3

1064

Lead

Pb

82

207.2

11.34

328

Target Alloy

Composition wt%

Weighed Atomic Number

Weighed Atomic weight

Density g.cm3

Melting point °C

Gold/Palladium

Au/Pd 80/20

72.4

178.858

17.84

1440

Gold/Palladium

Au/Pd 60/40

65.8

160.748

13.98

1350

Platinum/Palladium

Pt/Pd 80/20

71.6

177.35

19.28

1760

 

Gold
Gold is the most widely used coating material to coat non-conductive samples for standard SEM applications. Due to its low work function it is a very efficient to coat. When using cool sputter coaters whilst sputtering thin layers, there is hardly any heating of the sample surface. The grain size is visible when using high magnifications on modern SEMs. Gold can be used for low and medium magnification applications and is an ideal coating material for table top SEMs with air as process gas (the gold structure is not imaged due to the reduced resolution of table top SEMs).
A method to remove gold from fossil type SEM sample can be found in this PDF: Removing gold from SEM samples.

Gold/Palladium
The Au/Pd alloy (60/40 and 80/20) is less efficient to coat than with pure gold, which results in lower sputter rates. Au/Pd is often recommended to achieve a smaller grain size. Au/Pd does result in smaller grain sizes when evaporated in high vacuum, but when used in SEM sputter coaters the difference between Au and Au/Pd is hardly visible. Less suitable for heat sensitive specimens and less suitable for EDX analysis due to the extra set of peaks for Pd.

Silver
Ag is a most suitable and lower cost alternative for Au in many imaging applications for low and medium magnifications ranges. It is a widely underestimated coating material. Ag has the highest conductivity of all metals. When using EDS, Ag is an alternative for Au on many biological samples if P, Cl and S need to be analyzed. The sputtering rate is similar to Au, the SE yield is somewhat lower than for Pt, Au or Ir. The grain sizes is similar or slightly larger than Au, except for samples containing halogens which can  exhibit coarser grains. The Ag coating can tarnish (in the presence of halogens) and is less suitable for long term storage. Excellent low cost coating material for less demanding imaging applications and table top SEMs.
An additional advantage is that the Ag coating can be dissolved and the sample surface can be studied afterward in original conditions. Removal of Au, Au/Pt, Pt and Ir coatings is more difficult and involves very harsh chemicals. The Ag coating can be removed with Farmer's reducer (Mixture of Potassium Ferricyanide and Sodium Thiosulfate)

Platinum
Pt has a finer grain size than Au or Au/Pd and is therefore more suitable for higher magnifications applications. Excellent SE yield. The higher work function results in a lower sputtering rate than for Au. Pt tends to be sensitive for “stress cracking” when oxygen is present (porous sample can be a source of oxygen). More expensive than Au due to higher fabrication costs.

Platinum/Palladium
Pt/Pd alloy (80/20) has a similar small grain size and SE yield as pure Pt, but it is less sensitive to “stress cracking”. Suitable all-round coating material for FESEM applications when thin coatings are used. Best results are achieved when using high resolution sputter coaters.

Iridium
Ir exhibits a very fine grain size on virtually all materials and is an excellent all-round fine grain coating material for FESEM applications. It is the material of choice for high and ultra-high resolution FESEM  imaging.  With the added benefit of being a non-oxidising material and a high SE yield, it has been replacing Chromium for high resolution sample coating.  It requires the use of a high resolution sputter coater and it has lower sputtering rates. The targets are thicker due to fabricated constraints, but overall costs are lower than for Pt or Pt/Pd. Ir is also an excellent alternative coating material for coating samples which have to be analyzed for carbon by EDX or WDX. A thin layer is enough to create excellent conductivity and since the material is very rare it hardly interferes with EDX or WDX analysis.

Chromium
Cr has a very fine grain size, especially on semiconductor type materials and has proven to be a useful coating materials for FESEM applications. Cr requires the use of a turbo pumped, high vacuum, high resolution sputter coater with a target shutter for target conditioning. The higher vacuum in combination with pure Argon flushing of the chamber reduces the partial pressure of oxygen enough to avoid oxidisation of the sputtered Cr layer. The Cr on the sample surface will oxidise in air and samples must be viewed immediately after coating. Samples can be stored in high vacuum. Cr has lower sputtering rates and the target tends to heat up. Lower SE yield than Pt, Pt/Pd or Ir. Excellent coating material for high resolution BSE imaging of low Z and biological samples.

Tungsten
W is an excellent alternative for high-resolution coating. W has a very fine grain size and tends to be less visible than Cr. W oxidises rapidly, similar to Cr. Low sputtering rates, but SE yield tends to be higher. Samples must be imaged immediately after coating.

Tantalum
Ta is also candidate for high resolution coating (most refractory and high melting metals exhibit a finer grain size). IT oxidises quite rapidly, similar to Cr. Low sputtering rates, but due to its high atomic number, the SE yield tends to be higher. Samples must be imaged immediately after coating or stored under high vacuum.

Palladium
Pd has been used as a lower cost alternative for low to medium magnification ranges. Recently, the cost of Pd has increased significantly, making only Ag the lower cost alternative to Au. Gives a lower SE signal than Au.  When using EDX analysis, Pd can be an alternative.

Nickel
Ni is an alternative coating material for EDX applications and BE imaging. Not ideal for SE imaging, the coating oxidises slowly. It has (very) low sputtering rate due to the low work functions and the fact that as a magnetic materials it “short circuits” the magnet in the DC magnetron sputter with a less dense plasma as a result. In a standard SEM coater the coating contains a mixture of Ni and Ni-oxide. The Ni coating layer can enhance elements through X-ray fluorescence. The Ni coating can be removed, if needed, with a Hydrochloric acid or Nitric acid.

Copper
Cu is an alternative low cost material for EDX applications and BE imaging. Suitable for low and medium magnification ranges. Lower SE yield. Coatings will slowly oxidise. In a standard SEM coater the coating consists of a mixture of Cu and Cu-oxide. The Cu coating layer can be used to enhance the analysis of transition materials through X-ray fluorescence. The Cu coating can be removed, if needed, with a Ferrichloride acid or Nitric acid.

Titanium
Ti is rarely used as coating material, but it has applications where it is chosen to avoid any interference with EDX analysis. Low atomic number gives less interference with BSE imaging. Ti oxidises quite rapidly and samples need to be imaged immediately after coating

Carbon
Carbon is not a material which can be sputtered with DC magnetron systems; it tends to deposit as non-conductive DLC. Carbon is preferred for BSE imaging and X-ray micro analysis. Carbon exhibits excellent transparency for electrons and X-rays. Carbon can be used in ion-beam coaters such as the Gatan models 681, 682 and 685. Otherwise it is used in carbon evaporators to coat SEM samples or to produce carbon support films for TEM.




SEM Supplies

TEM Supplies

Calibration

Sample Preparation

AFM / SPM

  Product Menu with Images
  SEM Sample Stubs
  Carbon Tabs
  Sample Stub Adapters
  SEM Stage Adapters
  SEM Sample Holders
  SEM Preparation Stands
  Filaments / Cathodes
  Silicon Finder Grid
  Gatan 3View Pins
  FEI Volumescope Pins
  SEM Stub Storage Boxes
  Phenom Supplies
  JEOL NeoScope Supplies
  Hitachi TM Series Supplies
  Field & Lab Sampler Kits
  FlowView liquid sample Kit

Instruments

  Acoustic Enclosures
  Cressington SEM coaters
  TEM Sample Prep
  Diaphragm Pump
  Rotary vacuum Pump
  Precision diamond saw  
  TEM Grids
  TEM Support Films
  Silicon Nitride Films
  K-Kit Wet Cell Holder
  Graphene Films
  TEM Grid Boxes
  Cryo Grid Boxes
  TEM Sample Staining
  3mm Embedding Tubes
  Filaments/Cathodes
  Eyelash Manipulators

Cryo Supplies

  Cryo Grid Boxes
  Other Cryo Supplies

FIB Supplies

  FIB Lift-out Grids
  FIB Low Profile Stubs
  FIB Grid Holders
  FIB Pre-tilt Holders
  FIB Pre-tilt stubs
  FIB Grid Boxes
  SEM / FIB Magn. Calib.
  SEM Res. Test Spec.
  EDS / WDS Calibration
  TEM Calibration
  AFM / SPM Calibration
  LM Magn. Calibration

Vacuum Supplies

  Vacuum Gauges
  KF/NW Vacuum Parts
  KF/NW Vacuum Hoses
  ISO Vacuum flange parts
  Vacuum Oil and Grease
  Vacuum Sealant
  Diaphragm Pump
  Rotary vacuum Pump
  Vacuum Sample Storage
  Vacuum Pick-Up Pens

Sample Coating Supplies

  Sputter Targets
  Carbon Rods & Fibers
  Quartz QCM Crystals
  SEM Sample Coating Fluid

Evaporation Supplies

  Thermal Evaporation Sources
  Evaporation Materials
  Supports & Substrates
  SEM Preparation Stands
  Tweezers
  Probes & Picks
  Applicators & Swabs
  Plastic Transfer Pipettes
  Cutting Tools / Scissors
  Conductive Paint/Cement
  Conductive Tapes & Tabs
  Non-Conductive Adhesives
  Sample Storage
  Hand Tools
  Sorting Wire Mesh
  Preparation Surfaces
  Cleaning / Gloves
  Conductive Metal Powders
  Metallographic Sample Prep
  AFM/SPM Discs
  AFM/SPM Disc Pick-up Tool
  AFM/SPM Holders
  AFM/SPM Disc Storage
  Cantilever Tweezers
  AFM/SPM Discs Tweezers
  Nano-Tec Mica Discs
  HOPG Substrates

Light Microscopy

  Correlative Cover Slips
  Glass Microscope Slides
  Glass Cover Slips
  Quartz Microscope Slides
  Quartz Cover Slips
  Black Metal Slides
  Slide Storage Boxes
  LM Calibration
  Plastic Transfer Pipettes
  Optical Lens Tissue
  Glass Petri Dishes
  Digital Microscope
  PTFE Beakers